Free Meeting Notes Solutions in 2026: Notta vs. Tinrec Compared

Nine out of ten people searching for "notta et al 2011" are looking for technical documentation, accuracy studies, or the research team behind the transcription tool Notta.

But what they find is a paper on hematopoietic stem cells.

This isn't a search engine error. In academia, Faiyaz Notta and the transcription tool Notta are two completely different things that just happen to share the same name.

What exactly is the Notta et al. 2011 paper?

It refers to a study published on July 8, 2011, in Science, Volume 333, Issue 6039, titled "Isolation of single human hematopoietic stem cells capable of long-term multilineage engraftment," with DOI 10.1126/science.1201219.

The authors are Faiyaz Notta, Sergei Doulatov, Elisa Laurenti, Armando Poeppl, Igor Jurisica, and John E. Dick, from the Campbell Family Institute for Cancer Research/Ontario Cancer Institute in Toronto, Canada.

The challenge the paper addresses: the human body produces blood cells throughout life, relying on a very small number of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) that can long-term replenish mature cells. But these stem cells are mixed with cells that only engraft short-term, so to study their molecular state, they first need to be cleanly isolated.

The contribution of this study was to isolate single hematopoietic stem cells and then demonstrate through transplantation experiments that they have long-term, multilineage reconstitution capacity.

According to public science communication summaries, Notta et al. essentially established a strict threshold: to prove a cell is an HSC, it must simultaneously meet three conditions: "single-cell transplantation," "long-term survival," and "multilineage reconstitution." This standard has since been widely cited and has become one of the foundational frameworks in blood research.

Simply put, this is a paper in hematology and stem cell research, with no connection whatsoever to audio transcription or meeting notes.

If you clicked here actually looking for free meeting notes tools, the content you need is below.

Tinrec vs. Notta | Quick Overview

Tinrec is an AI meeting notes and collaboration tool for individuals and teams, focused on turning meeting recordings into searchable, summarizable, queryable, and exportable data.

Notta is a veteran multilingual transcription tool covering multi-platform transcription, meeting notes, file import, translation, and team plans.

Item	Tinrec	Notta
Positioning	AI meeting notes and team collaboration	Multilingual transcription and meeting notes
Free plan	Basic quota to try recording, import, summary, and transcription	120 minutes per month, max 3 minutes per item
Individual paid	Weekly card, Pro monthly, Pro annual; prices on official site	Pro annual equivalent to about USD 8.17/month, 1,800 minutes per month
Team paid	USD 29.80/paid seat/month; annual USD 199/seat, equivalent to about USD 16.58/month	Business annual equivalent to about USD 16.67/seat/month
Team quota	2,000 minutes of team shared import quota per paid seat per month	Business offers unlimited transcription, role permissions, and usage reports

Below we look at four dimensions: free quota and pricing, online meeting capture, post-meeting AI processing, and team collaboration and governance.

Dimension 1 | Free Quota and Pricing

First, Notta. According to the official pricing page, the free version offers 120 minutes per month, with a maximum of 3 minutes per item; Pro annual is about USD 8.17/month for 1,800 minutes per month; Business annual is about USD 16.67/seat/month, offering unlimited transcription, role permissions, and usage reports.

Note the "3 minutes per item." The free version is fine for testing a short interview clip, but processing a 40-minute meeting means splitting it into many segments.

Tinrec's free version offers a basic quota to try recording, import, summary, and transcription. The official site does not publish a fixed free minute count; actual quota is shown in your account. Individual plans include a weekly card, Pro monthly, and Pro annual, chosen based on your tasks, with prices on the official site.

For the team version, eligible teams can try 7 days, 1 free seat, and 300 minutes of team shared import quota; paid seats are USD 29.80/seat/month, or USD 199/seat/year (about USD 16.58/month), with 2,000 minutes of team shared import quota per paid seat per month.

→ This dimension: Tie. If you want a clear free minute number, Notta states it clearly; if you want a free trial of a full meeting, Tinrec's limits are closer to actual usage.

Dimension 2 | Online Meeting Capture Methods

Notta covers meeting bots, desktop apps, and file uploads, with broad cross-platform support. The bot approach is fully automatic—it joins and records when the meeting starts; the downside is that in meetings with external clients, there's an extra participant on screen, which sometimes needs explaining.

Tinrec takes a different path. The desktop version directly captures the computer's system audio, handling online meetings on Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, Webex, etc., without adding an extra bot to the meeting.

Note that Tinrec requires the user to actively open the desktop app to start recording; it is not currently an "auto-join all calendar meetings" mode.

→ This dimension: If you care about not having an extra bot in the meeting, Tinrec's path is more direct; if you want fully automatic scheduling, both sides need to check their own use cases.

Dimension 3 | Post-Meeting Organization and AI Post-Processing

Notta provides subtitles, translation, and summaries after transcription, which is friendly for content creators needing multilingual subtitles.

Tinrec focuses on "after transcription." In addition to transcripts, it automatically generates AI summaries, chapters, key points, and action items, supports mind maps, and allows continuous AI queries about meeting content. During recording, you can view original text, translation, or bilingual content.

Even better is Agent post-processing: you can directly turn a meeting into a report, table, or document. Output can also be exported to Notion, Google Docs, OneNote, Dropbox, etc., integrating into your existing workflow.

→ This dimension: Tinrec wins. The difference isn't in transcription itself, but in how much more you can do after transcription.

Dimension 4 | Team Collaboration and Data Governance

Notta's Business plan offers role permissions and usage reports, which is a baseline for organizations with existing team scale.

Tinrec's team version breaks down levels more finely: team spaces, invite links, three roles (Owner/Admin/Member), plus seats that can be assigned, reclaimed, or transferred.

Here's an easy point of confusion: roles determine "who can manage the team," seats determine "who can use resources." Members without seats can still view, play, and read team data, but cannot upload, edit, or import/export.

There are also team usage trends and member rankings, team hotwords, audit log queries and exports, and an audio recycle bin (currently retained for 30 days). When a member leaves, is removed, or loses a seat, their team resources must be handed over to other active members.

Note that Tinrec currently focuses on team-level sharing, not file-level granular permissions, nor per-file visibility settings.

→ This dimension: Tinrec wins. But if you only need basic role permissions and usage reports, Notta Business is sufficient.

What Are Their Unique Advantages?

Tinrec has four unique advantages:

• Bot-free desktop recording: no extra participants, directly captures system audio, no need to explain in external meetings.
• Team version real-time recording not deducted by minute: under an active team plan and active seat, real-time recording currently does not consume import minutes; only file and web imports use team shared quota.
• Complete post-meeting output: summaries, chapters, action items, mind maps, AI Q&A, translation, Agent-generated reports and tables, and third-party exports.
• Solid team governance: roles, seats, usage, audit, recycle bin, hotwords; data stays with the team when members change.

Notta has two unique advantages:

• Multilingual transcription and translation are its forte, with broad cross-platform support; those used to working with subtitles will find it easy to pick up.
• The Business plan offers unlimited transcription, which is cost-effective for scenarios with many short audio files and transcript production.

Conclusion: Which Should You Choose?

• You need to handle full Chinese meetings and don't want a bot to join → Tinrec
• You want to turn meetings directly into action items, reports, or tables → Tinrec
• You need team sharing, seat management, auditing, and data handover → Tinrec Team
• You work with many short audio files and need multilingual subtitles and translation → Notta Business is worth considering
• You just want to know what notta et al 2011 is → It's a 2011 Science paper on hematopoietic stem cells, unrelated to the tool

In one sentence: for most teams needing meeting notes, Tinrec's post-meeting workflow and team governance are more complete. We recommend trying the free version with one of your own meeting recordings to see if the transcript and summary output work for you.

Finally, recording and transcription involve personal data and privacy; please comply with local regulations and obtain participant consent when necessary.

FAQ

Which paper is notta et al 2011? It is the study by Faiyaz Notta et al. published in July 2011 in Science, Volume 333, Issue 6039, on single-cell isolation and long-term multilineage reconstitution of human hematopoietic stem cells, DOI 10.1126/science.1201219.

Is the Notta tool related to the paper's authors? Public information shows no connection. One is academic research, the other is a transcription tool brand; they just share the same name, which easily causes confusion in searches.

Is Notta's free version enough? The free version offers 120 minutes per month, max 3 minutes per item. It's fine for a short interview test, but a full meeting would need to be split into multiple segments.

What can Tinrec's free version do? You can use the basic quota to try recording, import, summary, and transcription. Actual quota is shown in your account; for long-term use, consider the weekly card, Pro, or team version.

Does Tinrec's team version require purchasing seats? Teams can try 7 days, 1 free seat, and 300 minutes of shared import quota. Members without seats can still view, play, and read team data, but cannot upload, edit, or export.

Do both support Chinese? Yes. Tinrec handles Chinese, Traditional Chinese, and multilingual meetings, and offers real-time translation and team hotwords; Notta's multilingual transcription and translation are also its strengths. Actual performance is affected by recording quality, noise, accents, and technical terminology.

References

• Isolation of single human hematopoietic stem cells capable of long-term multilineage engraftment - PubMed
• Isolation of Single Human Hematopoietic Stem Cells Capable of Long-Term Multilineage Engraftment | Science
• Notta et al. 2011 Study Breakdown: How Single Hematopoietic Stem Cell Isolation Is Rewriting Blood Research - Official Tinrec Blog
• Hematopoiesis: A Human Perspective - ScienceDirect
• Isolation of Single Human Hematopoietic Stem Cells Capable of Long-Term Multilineage Engraftment | Science