Turn recordings into transcripts and summaries in minutes
Upload audio or video for multilingual transcription, AI notes, and action items
Halfway Through a Meeting, Jamboard Suddenly Disappears
If you use Google Meet often, this scene should be familiar: during a brainstorming session, you casually open Jamboard, draw flowcharts, stick notes, and the whole team writes together—so convenient you don't want to use anything else.
But the Jamboard app officially shut down at the end of 2024. Google's official stance is that it will provide clear data retention and migration paths, allowing users to move Jamboard content to FigJam, Lucidspark, and Miro. That sounds like an answer, but in actual meetings, the pain points go beyond "where does the whiteboard go."
First, the whiteboard is only half the meeting. After drawing, who follows up? When is it due? These never automatically appear on the whiteboard. Second, post-meeting notes. After an hour-long meeting, you still spend another hour listening to the recording and typing a transcript—that's the most grueling part. Third, cross-platform. You can only open the whiteboard when you start Meet on a computer; colleagues joining by phone just get a link, a completely different experience.
This article aims to help you figure out: after Jamboard, how should you choose collaboration tools for Google Meet?
Before Choosing, Understand These 4 Key Points
1. Is it natively embedded in Google Meet? Many whiteboard tools require you to open a separate tab and share your screen. Jumping in and out during a meeting makes it easy to miss key points. What's truly useful is one that opens with a click in Meet's Activities panel and is visible to all participants simultaneously.
2. Is there a record after the meeting? The biggest pain in the Jamboard era was data loss. When choosing a tool, ask clearly: can whiteboard content, recordings, and transcripts be saved and exported? If it's just a one-time live view that disappears after the meeting, it's useless.
3. Beyond the whiteboard, how are meeting notes handled? The whiteboard solves "drawing together," but not "post-meeting follow-up." The real output of a meeting is summaries, decisions, and action items. Relying on manual typing for this is always the most time-consuming part.
4. Device compatibility and pricing model Google has stated that joining Meet on a mobile phone or tablet does not allow direct whiteboard access; you'll be directed to an app or link. Also, watch the pricing—if even colleagues just joining to watch have to pay per seat, the cost adds up quickly.
Tinrec (秒聽錄音) — Our Top Pick After Testing
Tinrec (秒聽錄音) is an AI meeting notes and collaboration tool for individuals and teams, covering iOS, Android, and web, with a desktop version that can directly capture computer system audio.
To be clear: Tinrec is not a whiteboard tool. For your brainstorming sessions, you can still use Google Meet's built-in Whiteboarding or Miro. Tinrec solves the other side—before and after the whiteboard: start recording before the meeting, and have something left after it ends.
In practice: when you start a Meet, the desktop version of Tinrec directly captures system audio without inviting any meeting bot. The participant list won't have an unknown account added—especially important for client or external meetings. It generates transcripts while the meeting is ongoing, handles mixed Chinese-English content, and during recording you can view the original text, translation, or bilingual side-by-side in real time.
The post-meeting part is the key. Tinrec automatically generates summaries, chapters, and highlights, and extracts action items—who is responsible and what to do, all clear at a glance. The most practical feature is AI Q&A: you can directly ask "Who mentioned the budget in the last meeting?" It doesn't dump a bunch of keyword search results on you; it answers directly based on semantic understanding. Few tools at this price point have this feature.
Stop organizing recordings by hand
Upload audio or video and automatically get a transcript, summary, and action items
There are also mind maps, multi-format export (can be taken to Notion, Google Docs, OneNote, Dropbox for further editing), and Agent post-processing that generates reports, tables, and documents based on meeting content. The team version even has an independent team space, where meeting data belongs to the team and won't be taken away when members leave; admins can manage roles, seats, sharing rights, usage, and audit logs.
Limitations upfront: Tinrec does not provide whiteboard drawing. If you need a canvas to draw on, it's not for you. The free version has only basic quota; heavy users need to pay. Also, accuracy is affected by recording quality, ambient noise, accents, and multiple people talking over each other—the official does not and should not promise a fixed percentage.
Who it's for: Those who frequently hold mixed Chinese-English meetings, need to write notes and follow up on action items afterward, and don't want to buy extra hardware or invite bots into meetings.
Besides Tinrec, What Other Options Are There?
Google Meet built-in Whiteboarding (FigJam / Lucidspark / Miro) Open the whiteboard with one click in the Activities panel at the bottom right of Meet, synced for all participants—the most direct successor to Jamboard. FigJam, Lucidspark, and Miro all allow launching a whiteboard directly within a Meet call. The downside is they are essentially whiteboard tools—meeting recording, transcripts, and action item follow-up are not their strengths. No matter how beautifully you draw on the whiteboard, you still need another tool for post-meeting notes. This is exactly where Tinrec fills the gap.
Whiteboard for Google Meet A third-party add-on that claims native embedding in Meet's Activities panel, one click for everyone to join the same board, positioned as a Jamboard alternative, with permanent whiteboard saving and free viewing for spectators. If your need is purely "a whiteboard that doesn't disappear," take a look. But it only does whiteboarding—no meeting transcription, no summaries, no action item extraction; Tinrec has these and it doesn't.
Otter.ai A veteran choice for English meetings, with a generous free tier of 300 minutes per month. But it's mainly designed for English business meetings, with limited Cantonese support—if your meetings are in Cantonese or mixed Chinese-English, it may not suit you. It also lacks whiteboard functionality.
Pitfall Guide: 3 Most Common Traps When Choosing Meeting Tools
Pitfall 1: Thinking Jamboard shutdown means no whiteboard available. Actually, Google Meet already has built-in Whiteboarding, allowing you to launch FigJam, Lucidspark, or Miro directly in a call. You don't need to rush to buy a new tool. What you really need to think about is: what about the parts beyond the whiteboard?
Pitfall 2: Only looking at the whiteboard, not post-meeting. The value of a meeting isn't how many boxes you drew on the whiteboard, but whether anyone follows up afterward. Before choosing a tool, ask yourself: after the meeting, what do I need to deliver? If the answer is notes and action items, then a whiteboard tool won't help.
Pitfall 3: Ignoring device and pricing model. Joining Meet on a phone or tablet won't open the whiteboard; you'll be directed to an app or link. Also, if the tool charges per seat, even colleagues just listening in count, so calculate the cost early.
Conclusion: How Should You Choose?
- Want a Jamboard replacement whiteboard → Google Meet built-in Whiteboarding (FigJam / Lucidspark / Miro), native one-click launch
- Want permanent whiteboard saving, no per-seat charges → Whiteboard for Google Meet
- Need recording, transcripts, summaries, and action items for meetings → Tinrec (desktop version records without a bot, supports Meet, Zoom, Teams, Webex)
- Want to use AI to query meeting content directly after recording → Tinrec (AI Q&A is its differentiating feature)
- Pure English meetings, zero budget → Otter.ai
Ultimately, Jamboard's shutdown isn't the end of the world; it's an opportunity to rethink: what truly needs to be kept from a meeting. Whiteboards are erased after drawing; notes and action items are what carry forward. If you want to try, start with Tinrec's free version, use the basic quota for two or three meetings to feel the effect, and consider upgrading if it fits.
References
Turn every recording into actionable outcomes
Get 60 free transcription minutes when you sign in. No credit card required.
Related Reading
You might also like

Notta vs Tinrec 2026: 5-Dimension Comparison & What 'notta jakarta' Really Means
Half of people searching 'notta jakarta' are looking for Notta Dining House, a restaurant in South Jakarta; the other half actually want the meeting transcription tool Notta. This article first distinguishes the two Nottas, then compares Notta and Tinrec across 5 dimensions to help you decide which is better for Chinese meetings and post-meeting organization.

How to Download Notta Transcripts: 3 Export Methods Tested in 2026 (The Fastest Way)
Downloading Notta transcripts isn't hard—the challenge is picking the wrong format, lacking plan permissions, or hitting batch limits. This guide covers the complete export steps for Notta Web and mobile app, which advanced options to check, and compares Notta, Tinrec, TurboScribe, and Otter.ai for post-meeting organization, helping you choose the right tool.

Notta Jakarta Menu 2026: Hours, Address & 3 AI Transcription Tools Compared
Searching for "notta jakarta menu"? You might be looking for Notta Dining House in Jakarta, or the Notta AI transcription tool. This guide covers Notta Dining House's address, hours, and freestyle tasting menu, then compares Notta, Otter.ai, Granola, and Tinrec for meeting notes—so you can tell the two "Nottas" apart.

Notta Japanese Transcription: Which Tool Wins? 2026 Hands-On Test of 4 Options, Tinrec for Team Meetings
Is Notta good for Japanese transcription? Starting from the real workflow of Japanese meeting minutes, this article compares Tinrec, Notta, Otter.ai, and TurboScribe in terms of positioning, pricing, and post-meeting organization capabilities, helping you decide which one suits individual transcription, team meeting knowledge retention, or bulk processing of long audio files.

3 AI Voice Recorders Tested in 2026: Is Notta Memo Worth Buying? Read This First
Notta Memo is a card-sized portable AI voice recorder that records with one tap and automatically transcribes. This article covers Notta Memo's specs, pricing, free transcription quota, and where to buy, and compares it with PLAUD NotePin, Granola, Otter.ai, and other options to help you decide whether to buy hardware or use software for meeting notes.

2026 iOS Transcription Apps Compared: Tinrec vs Notta for Chinese Meetings
Many assume that installing a transcription app on an iPhone will automatically generate meeting notes, but in practice, quotas, audio quality, and post-meeting organization are the real keys. This article starts with common misconceptions and compares Notta iOS and Tinrec on online meeting recording, post-meeting organization, AI follow-up questions, and team data management to help you decide which workflow better suits your daily needs.

Best AI Recording Tools in 2026: 5 Tested, Notta Memo Price & Alternatives
Notta Memo is priced at USD 149, but hardware is only part of the cost—transcription quotas and subscription fees add up. This guide cuts through the common price-comparison mistake of looking only at the hardware sticker price, breaking down the real costs, capability limits, and best-use scenarios for 5 AI recording and meeting-notes approaches so you can calculate total cost before deciding.

How to Transcribe Indonesian Audio to Text in 2026: Notta Supports Indonesian + Tinrec Post-Meeting Organization
How to choose Indonesian meeting transcription? This article addresses three common pitfalls, explains 4 key points for selecting an Indonesian transcription tool, compares Notta, Otter.ai, TurboScribe, and Tinrec, and shares practical tips and pitfalls to avoid for teams handling mixed Chinese-Indonesian meetings.

2026 Comparison of 3 Japanese Transcription Tools: Is 'notta in japanese' a Verb or a Tool?
People searching for 'notta in japanese' fall into two camps: those looking up the Japanese word '乗った/載った' and those looking for Japanese transcription tools like Notta. This article first clarifies the meaning of 'notta' in Japanese, then compares Tinrec, Notta, Otter.ai, and TurboScribe from four perspectives: recognition quality, real-time transcription, post-meeting organization, and team collaboration, to help you choose the right tool.
