Turn recordings into transcripts and summaries in minutes
Upload audio or video for multilingual transcription, AI notes, and action items
2026 Comparison of 2 Transcription Tools: How to Use Yating Transcript vs. Tinrec
If you're searching for "how to use Yating Transcript," chances are you already have a recording on hand—a meeting, an interview, or a class.
But what you really want to know isn't where the buttons are; it's "how much time will I still spend organizing after transcription."
This article is divided into two parts: first, it explains the steps for using Yating Transcript; then, from the decision point of "what else can be done after transcription," it compares it with Tinrec.
Which one to choose depends on whether you want a simple transcript or meeting materials that you can continue to query, organize, and delegate.
Yating Transcript vs. Tinrec | Quick Overview
Yating Transcript is an AI transcription software developed by a Taiwanese team, focusing on speech-to-text; Tinrec is a meeting collaboration tool that connects recording, transcription, summarization, to-dos, and team spaces.
| Item | Yating Transcript | Tinrec |
|---|---|---|
| Core positioning | AI transcription software | AI meeting notes and team collaboration |
| Main access | Mobile app (iOS / Android), web version | Web, desktop, mobile |
| Pricing | Billed by duration, can be stacked | Free / weekly / Pro monthly, yearly; team version per seat |
| Post-meeting output | Transcript editing, highlighting | Summary, chapters, to-dos, AI Q&A, multi-format export, team space |
| Best for | Occasionally converting a recording to text | Weekly meetings, need for沉淀 and collaboration |
Below, we'll first explain how to use it, then compare across 5 dimensions.
First, Understand How to Use Yating Transcript: 3 Steps
Step 1: Open the app, tap the recording icon at the bottom
Open the Yating Transcript app at a meeting, lecture, or interview, and press record to start real-time recording and automatic transcription. You can check the audio quality while recording.
If you already have a recording on your phone or computer, you can upload the audio file directly, and the system will automatically transcribe and analyze it in the background.
Step 2: Wait for it to finish; don't worry if the progress bar is stuck at 99%
The official explanation is clear: 99% means text recognition is complete, and the system is doing subsequent processing, such as speaker segmentation and key point summarization.
These steps take some time, so the progress bar will stay at 99%, but the system is still working.
Step 3: Tap "Export" in the top right corner of the transcript screen
After transcription is complete, you can download your transcript from the "All Transcripts" list, or tap "Export" in the top right corner of the transcript screen to save the file.
The transcript itself can be edited and highlighted for easy reference later.
One limitation to note: an account cannot be used on multiple devices simultaneously. If you record on your phone and want to edit on your computer, you'll need to handle the login status first.
Dimension 1 | Free Quota and Pricing
Yating Transcript's approach is straightforward: you can sign up with a Google account, and after registration, you get 300 minutes of free quota, but there is a time limit. The free version includes most basic speech-to-text features, including audio upload, real-time recording, and a text editor.
Paid plans are sold by duration only, in 1-hour, 3-hour, and 10-hour packages, which can be stacked, or you can contact sales to purchase longer durations at once. The cheapest plan is currently about NT$160 for 1 hour of transcription; actual prices are subject to the official website.
Tinrec uses a subscription model: the free version has a basic quota to try recording, import, summary, and transcription; for short-term intensive use, there's a weekly card; for regular use, a Pro monthly card; and for long-term data retention, a yearly card. The team version is priced per paid seat: USD 29.80/seat per month, or USD 199/seat per year (equivalent to about USD 16.58/month).
→ This dimension: If you only transcribe a few recordings a year, Yating's pay-per-duration is straightforward; but if you handle meetings every week, Tinrec's subscription bundles the post-transcription organization features, spreading the unit cost.
Dimension 2 | AI Post-Meeting Organization
After transcription, Yating Transcript performs speaker segmentation and key point summarization, and the transcript can be edited and highlighted.
Note that highlighting mainly records the text and cannot link back to the source location in the transcript; it also tends to tag the entire document rather than organize sentence by sentence. When organizing long meetings, you'll need to open another document to take over.
Tinrec treats "after transcription" as its main battlefield: it automatically generates summaries, chapters, and key points, extracts to-dos from discussions, and allows AI Q&A around meeting content, so you can continue to ask "what was the final budget decision."
For output, you can export to common formats for Notion, Google Docs, OneNote, Dropbox, and use Agent post-processing to generate reports, tables, and meeting minutes.
→ This dimension: Tinrec clearly wins. The difference is not in transcription accuracy, but in how much manual work you still have to do after transcription.
Stop organizing recordings by hand
Upload audio or video and automatically get a transcript, summary, and action items
Dimension 3 | Online Meeting Recording and Cross-Platform
Yating Transcript's mobile app experience is the most intuitive, suitable for real-time recording during meetings, lectures, and interviews; the web version is suitable for uploading existing audio files.
If your meeting is on Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, or Webex, you'll have to figure out how to get the audio into your phone or convert it to a file, adding an extra step.
Tinrec's desktop version directly captures computer system audio, so for online meetings, you don't need to invite a meeting bot; the user simply starts recording.
To be clear: it is not a bot that automatically joins all calendar meetings, and supporting a platform does not mean official partnership with that platform.
Additionally, Tinrec supports real-time recording, mobile recording, and audio/video file transcription, so it can handle impromptu interviews on the go.
→ This dimension: For pure online meeting scenarios, Tinrec's process has one less step and wins.
Dimension 4 | Chinese and Multilingual Recognition
Yating Transcript supports multiple languages, and its recognition of Taiwanese accents, Taiwanese Hokkien, and mixed Chinese-English (Chinglish) has long been discussed as a strength.
Tinrec covers Chinese, Traditional Chinese, and multilingual meeting scenarios, supports mixed Chinese-English content organization, and during recording, you can view the original text, translation, or bilingual content; teams can maintain hotwords to train recognition with their product names and technical terms.
Neither should promise a fixed accuracy rate. Actual performance is affected by recording quality, background noise, accents, overlapping speakers, and technical terms.
→ This dimension: Tie. If your recordings are largely in Taiwanese Hokkien and Taiwanese accents, Yating's local experience is worth trying first; if your meetings are often cross-language, Tinrec's real-time translation and bilingual comparison are more useful.
Dimension 5 | Team Collaboration and Data Retention
Yating Transcript is primarily for personal accounts; transcribed documents stay in your own account, and sharing with multiple people requires extra work.
Tinrec's team version is a separate team space: you can create and switch between multiple teams, invite members via join links, and set owners/admins/regular members.
Here's a common confusion—roles and seats are two different things. Roles determine who can manage the team, members, and audits; seats determine whether members can record, upload, edit, import/export.
Members who are active but have no seat can still view, play, and read team data, but cannot perform resource usage operations.
For management, the team version provides usage trends and member rankings, team hotwords, and audit logs that can be queried and exported; accidentally deleted audio can be restored from the recycle bin (currently retained for 30 days), and when a member leaves or loses a seat, their team resources can be handed over to other members, so data doesn't leave with the person.
→ This dimension: Tinrec wins. As long as your meeting data needs to be shared and handed over among multiple people, the personal account model will soon hit a bottleneck.
What Are Their Unique Advantages?
Yating Transcript's advantages
Developed by a Taiwanese team, it has deep experience in recognizing local accents, Taiwanese Hokkien, and mixed Chinese-English, which is where it stands out among Chinese transcription tools.
Buying by duration, stackable, for those who only transcribe a few recordings a year, no subscription needed, cost is straightforward.
Tinrec's advantages
No meeting bot needed; desktop version directly captures system audio, saving a step for online meetings.
More than a transcript: summaries, chapters, to-dos, mind maps, AI Q&A, real-time translation, plus multi-format export and Agent post-processing, completing post-meeting deliverables in one go.
Team space turns meetings into searchable, collaborative assets, and adds governance with roles, seats, usage, and audits.
Conclusion: Which One Should You Choose?
• If you need recognition experience with Taiwanese Hokkien and Taiwanese accents → Yating Transcript is worth trying first, especially for small, one-time recordings. • If your meetings are mostly on Zoom, Meet, Teams → Tinrec (desktop version records without a bot, one less step) • If you use the transcript as a starting point and still need summaries, to-dos, and follow-up questions → Tinrec (AI Q&A and Agent post-processing) • If meeting data needs to be shared with the whole team and you need to manage members and usage → Tinrec team version (spaces, roles, seats, audits) • If you just need to turn a recording into text as cheaply as possible → Yating Transcript's duration plans are sufficient
In one sentence: for most people who need to handle meetings continuously, Tinrec is a more complete choice.
But don't rush to decide—first take a real recording of your own, run it through both, and see whose output you'd rather use directly.
FAQ
Q1: How long can I use Yating Transcript for free?
After registration, you get 300 minutes of free quota, but there is a time limit; the free version includes basic features like audio upload, real-time recording, and a text editor. When the quota is used up or the period expires, you need to purchase duration.
Q2: The progress bar is stuck at 99%, is it broken?
No. 99% means text recognition is complete, and the system is doing subsequent processing like speaker segmentation and key point summarization, which takes some time. When done, you can download from the "All Transcripts" list.
Q3: Can Yating Transcript be logged in on both phone and computer at the same time?
No, an account cannot be used on multiple devices simultaneously. You need to handle the login status before switching devices.
Q4: Does Tinrec need to invite a meeting bot into the meeting?
No. Tinrec's desktop version directly captures computer system audio to record online meetings, started by the user. But it is not a bot that automatically joins all calendar meetings.
Q5: Can AI-generated summaries and to-dos be used directly as meeting minutes?
It's not recommended. AI may miss or misunderstand details; important information should be verified against the transcript and recording playback. Transcription tools reduce manual recording costs but cannot fully replace human judgment.
Q6: What legal issues should I be aware of when recording and transcribing?
Recording and transcription involve local laws and participant consent. It's best to inform and obtain consent before the meeting, and for confidential content, confirm the tool's data processing methods.
References
- Yating Transcript
- Yating Transcript
- Complete Guide to Yating Transcript: Free Version, Pricing, and Alternatives
- How to Use Yating Transcript: Efficiency Tips from Recording to Subtitle Post-Production - Edimakor
- A Helpful Tool for Interview Transcripts: Yating Transcript Studio / Yating Studio: A Helpful Tool for Interview Transcripts
Turn every recording into actionable outcomes
Get 60 free transcription minutes when you sign in. No credit card required.
Related Reading
You might also like

Yating Transcript vs Tinrec in 2026: 5-Dimension Comparison for Chinese Meeting Notes
Is Yating Transcript good? This article breaks down real evaluations from speaker identification, Taiwanese Hokkien recognition, cost, and proofreading effort, and compares it with Tinrec, Notta, Otter, TurboScribe, and PLAUD to help you choose the right transcription tool for your meeting scenario.

How to Choose a Speech-to-Text App in 2026: Meeting Notes + AI Summaries & Action Items
Recording meetings is easy; organizing them afterward is the hard part. This guide covers 5 key factors for choosing a speech-to-text app based on real-world use cases, using Tinrec as the main example to demonstrate bot-free online meeting recording, AI summaries and action items, and AI Q&A. It also compares Otter.ai, Notta, and Yating Transcription, highlighting their positioning and pitfalls to avoid.

How to Record Audio on Mac in 2026: 6 Methods from Built-in Tools to AI Transcription
Recording audio on a Mac isn't hard—the challenge is making the recording useful afterward. This guide covers 6 ways to record on Mac, from free built-in options like Voice Memos, Notes transcription, QuickTime, and GarageBand, to Tinrec, which directly produces transcripts, summaries, and action items. It also includes selection advice and 4 things to know before recording.

4 Speech-to-Text Tools Tested for 2026: Is Yating Transcript Good? Which Saves the Most Time After Meetings?
Is Yating Transcript good? From the perspective of a mid-level manager who holds 15 meetings a week, I tested four speech-to-text tools: Yating Transcript, Tinrec, Otter.ai, and Notta. I compared them on Traditional Chinese and Taiwanese Hokkien recognition, post-meeting summaries and action items, AI Q&A, team collaboration, and pricing. I also compiled selection criteria and 3 common pitfalls to help you decide which one truly saves time on post-meeting organization.

2026 Comparison of 4 Online Transcription Tools: Yating vs. Tinrec — Which Should You Choose?
Starting from the real need for 'Yating online transcription,' this comparison examines Tinrec, Yating, Notta, and TurboScribe across Chinese recognition, post-meeting organization, online meeting recording, and team collaboration. It clearly explains each tool's limitations and ideal users to help you pick the one that truly saves time.

Cantonese Speech-to-Text App Comparison 2026: Tinrec vs Otter.ai — Which Wins on Five Dimensions?
Comparing Tinrec and Otter.ai across five dimensions—Cantonese with mixed English recognition, bot-free meeting recording, post-meeting AI organization, cross-platform input, and team seat governance—to help you decide which Cantonese speech-to-text app truly fits your meeting scenarios and budget.

2026 Comparison of 5 Transcription Tools' Free Tiers: Which Free Version Is Most Generous?
How many free minutes does Yating Transcription actually offer? Public sources cite 20 minutes, 120 minutes, and about 300 minutes. This article explains why these figures conflict, how pricing works after the free quota runs out, and compares the free plans and ideal use cases of Tinrec, Notta, Otter.ai, and TurboScribe to help you judge whether a one-time free allotment covers your actual usage.

Best Transcription Tools in 2026: Testing 3 Options, Yating Free Plan Limits and Tinrec Differences
People searching for "Yating transcription free" often ask: how much can the free version handle, do I have to pay to upload audio files, and is it enough for a meeting? This article compares Yating, Tinrec, Otter.ai, and Notta in terms of free quotas, Chinese recognition, and post-meeting organization, and lists 3 common pitfalls when choosing a tool to help you decide which one is worth using long-term.

Yating Transcription 2026 Guide: Is It Good, Limitations, and Better Alternatives
From a student's real-world usage scenarios, this guide examines whether Yating Transcription is good, common pitfalls, and why transcription is only the first step. It also explains how Tinrec uses live transcription, AI summaries, action item extraction, and AI Q&A to turn class and group discussion recordings into materials that can actually be reviewed and delivered.
