Notta Company Profile 2026: Japanese Entity, Parent Company, and 3 Practical Decision Points for Choosing a Tool

What company is Notta? This article covers Notta's operating entity (Japanese corporation Notta Inc.), overseas parent company NOTTA INC., founder background, and development team. It also provides three practical decision points—recording method, post-meeting workflow, and team governance and pricing—to help you decide between Notta and other AI meeting transcription tools.

Productivity Tips
QING
October 19, 2026
60 min
1 views

Turn recordings into transcripts and summaries in minutes

Upload audio or video for multilingual transcription, AI notes, and action items

When you're about to entrust a full year of meeting records to a single AI tool, the first thing you should confirm usually isn't the feature list—it's three questions: Who is this company? Where is the data stored? And can you reach someone if something goes wrong?

If you're searching for "Notta which company," the answer isn't simply "a Japanese company."

Notta's operating entity is the Japanese corporation "Notta Inc.," established on May 25, 2022. Its parent company is the overseas group NOTTA INC., and CEO Ryan Zhang is a serial entrepreneur of Chinese origin. Japanese and foreign media reports also indicate that development is centered in Shenzhen, and the group headquarters may be in Singapore.

In other words, it's closer to a combination of "Japanese entity, international team" rather than a purely Japanese or Chinese company.

What Company Is Notta? Quick Overview

Item Currently Available Information
Operating Entity Japanese corporation Notta Inc., established May 25, 2022; reports indicate registered in Chuo-ku, Tokyo
Parent Company NOTTA INC., an overseas group
CEO Ryan Zhang, of Chinese origin, previously involved with bike-sharing company Mobike
Development & Headquarters Reports indicate development team in Shenzhen; group headquarters possibly in Singapore
Product Positioning AI speech-to-text, real-time transcription, AI summaries, translation, meeting notes
Primary Market Mainly Japan, followed by Chinese and multilingual markets

This table also illustrates one thing: Notta has both a Japanese corporate identity and an overseas group structure, and the two are not mutually exclusive.

Decision Point 1 | Operating Entity Is a Japanese Corporation, Parent Company Overseas

In Japan, Notta is operated by the independent legal entity "Notta Inc." and provides Japanese-language support. The Japanese corporate registration can be found on the National Tax Agency's corporate number publication site, which is often cited as supporting documentation when Japanese companies prepare internal approval requests.

The most practical implication for readers is: if you're procuring in Japan, your contract and invoices will be with the Japanese entity, not the overseas parent company.

However, note that having a corporation in Japan does not mean development, data processing, and group decision-making all happen in Japan. The parent company NOTTA INC. is an overseas group, and the technical team and service infrastructure may still be configured across borders.

Decision Point 2 | Founder and Team: Chinese-Born CEO, Overseas Development

CEO Ryan Zhang is a serial entrepreneur of Chinese origin. He previously worked in online advertising and video platforms, later joined bike-sharing company Mobike, left around 2020, and founded Notta, choosing Japan as the primary market.

On the management side, reports indicate that COO Kiyoto Tamura assumed his position in 2024. He comes from a data SaaS company and adds experience in Japan localization and corporate operations.

The practical impact of this combination is: product design leans toward Japanese and Asian usage habits, but group resources and engineering capabilities are multinational.

So when someone asks, "Is Notta a Chinese company?" a more accurate description is: the operating entity is a Japanese corporation, the founding team has Chinese background, and development and group headquarters are overseas.

Decision Point 3 | Security Disclosures: What the Vendor Says

Notta's public disclosures include approximately 10 million cumulative users, adoption by over 4,000 companies, and a high usage rate among large Japanese enterprises. It also publishes ISO and other security certification information, and no public data breach reports have been seen.

Note that these figures are self-disclosed by the vendor and Japanese media, and are for reference only—they are not equivalent to third-party audit conclusions.

The real questions to ask are still those three: In which region is data stored? Will recordings be used for model training? Can the enterprise plan export operation logs? It's advisable to confirm these directly with the official source rather than relying solely on website copy.

Decision Point 4 | Language Focus: Japanese-Centric, Multilingual Support

Notta's biggest feature is support for real-time transcription and translation in 58 languages, with transcription accuracy reaching 98.86% in quiet environments—a figure frequently cited by media and the vendor.

Keep in mind that accuracy is affected by recording quality, noise, accents, overlapping speakers, and technical terminology—the same applies to any tool.

If 90% of your meetings are in Japanese, Notta's language depth and accumulated experience in the Japanese market are indeed well-matched.

If your meetings are primarily in Chinese and you need transcripts with mixed Chinese-English, the evaluation focus shifts to Chinese performance, bilingual alignment, and terminology recognition—not just the number of languages.

If You're Choosing a Tool: 3 Practical Decision Points

Once you understand the company background, the next question is usually: "So should I use Notta or another tool?"

Stop organizing recordings by hand

Upload audio or video and automatically get a transcript, summary, and action items

Here we compare Notta and Tinrec across three dimensions to clarify the differences.

Dimension A | How Meetings Are Recorded

Notta takes a multi-platform approach, covering real-time transcription, meeting notes, file import, translation, and team plans. The common workflow is to record or upload a file and then organize it afterward.

Tinrec's desktop version directly captures computer system audio. When handling online meetings on Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, Webex, etc., no additional bot needs to join the meeting.

In other words, no unfamiliar account appears in the participant list.

→ This dimension: If you care about "no recording bot appearing in the meeting," Tinrec's approach is more direct; if you just need to organize recording files afterward, both can do it.

Dimension B | What You Get After the Meeting

Notta provides transcripts, AI summaries, and translation. The Business plan also includes role permissions and usage reports—sufficient for "quickly obtaining text and summaries."

Tinrec focuses on what comes after transcription: automatically generating summaries, chapters, and action items; supporting AI Q&A around meeting content, mind maps; and using Agents for post-processing to produce reports, tables, and documents, with export to Notion, Google Docs, OneNote, Dropbox, and other tools.

→ This dimension: If you only need transcripts plus summaries, both are sufficient; if you need to follow up with questions afterward and directly produce deliverables, Tinrec's workflow is more complete.

Dimension C | Team Governance and Pricing

Notta's current plans: Free version offers 120 minutes per month, with a maximum of 3 minutes per item; Pro annual billing is approximately USD 8.17/month, with 1,800 minutes per month; Business annual billing is approximately USD 16.67/seat/month, including unlimited transcription, role permissions, and usage reports. Refer to the official pricing page for accuracy.

Tinrec team plan: Monthly billing is USD 29.80/paid seat/month; annual billing is USD 199/paid seat/year, equivalent to approximately USD 16.58/month. Each paid seat provides 2,000 minutes of team shared import quota per month; under an active team plan and active seats, real-time recording currently does not deduct minutes. First-time eligible users can try 7 days, 1 free seat, and 300 minutes of shared import quota.

Additionally, the team plan separates "roles" and "seats": roles determine who can manage the team, while seats determine whether one can record, upload, edit, and export. Members without seats can still view, play, and read team materials.

→ This dimension: Looking purely at unit price, Notta has a lower entry barrier; if you have high meeting volume and need "real-time recording without minute deduction + team shared quota + role-seat separation," Tinrec's combination is more suitable for team procurement.

What Unique Advantages Does Each Have?

Tinrec's notable advantages include:

  • No-bot recording: Desktop version captures system audio, no bot needed for online meetings.
  • Post-meeting workflow: Summaries, chapters, action items, AI Q&A, Agent-generated reports and documents.
  • Team knowledge base: Team spaces, member and seat management, usage analytics, audit logs, audio recycle bin (30-day retention).
  • Chinese and terminology: Chinese, Traditional Chinese, multilingual meetings, plus team hotword management for technical terms.

Notta's advantages are also clear:

  • Language breadth: Real-time transcription and translation in 58 languages, low barrier for multilingual teams.
  • Japan market depth: Japanese entity, Japanese-language support, and real cases of adoption by Japanese companies.

Conclusion: Who Should You Choose?

  • If you want the answer to "What company is Notta?" → Operated by Japanese corporation Notta Inc., parent company is overseas group NOTTA INC., an international team structure.
  • If your meetings are mainly in Japanese and you need multilingual translation → Notta's language depth is more aligned.
  • If you don't want a meeting bot joining the participant list → Tinrec uses desktop version to capture system audio.
  • If you want to follow up directly after meetings and produce action items and reports → Tinrec's post-processing workflow is more complete.
  • If you want to build a handover-ready meeting database for your team, requiring roles, seats, usage, and auditing → Tinrec's team plan breaks down governance items more granularly.
  • If you just occasionally organize a recording and have a limited budget → Notta's free version or Tinrec's free quota are both enough to test the waters.

In one sentence: Company background determines the "trust foundation," while tool choice determines "how much time you save each week." Looking at these two things separately is more practical than just asking "which country's company is it."

FAQ

Which country's company is Notta?

The operating entity is the Japanese corporation Notta Inc., and the parent company is the overseas group NOTTA INC. Therefore, "Japanese entity, international team" is the most accurate description.

Is Notta a Chinese company?

CEO Ryan Zhang is a serial entrepreneur of Chinese origin, and reports indicate the development team is in Shenzhen. However, the external operating and contracting entity is the Japanese corporation, so it cannot be simplified to a single nationality.

What is Notta's parent company called?

NOTTA INC., an overseas group. Reports indicate the group headquarters may be in Singapore.

When was Notta's Japanese entity established?

Established on May 25, 2022. It is primarily responsible for service operations and Japanese-language support in the Japanese market.

Does Notta support Chinese?

Yes, Notta supports real-time transcription and translation in 58 languages, including Chinese and mixed Chinese-English meetings. Actual performance is still affected by recording quality and accents.

What should I pay attention to when transcribing meeting recordings?

In addition to tool selection, pay attention to local regulations and company policies. When necessary, obtain participant consent before recording and transcribing.

(Company structure, plan details, and pricing are subject to change. Before any actual transaction, please refer to the official pages and contract.)

References

Turn every recording into actionable outcomes

Get 60 free transcription minutes when you sign in. No credit card required.

Upload audio or video for multilingual transcription, AI notes, and action items

Related Reading

You might also like

Notta Online Transcription Review 2026: Free Plan Limits, Traditional Chinese Accuracy, and Tinrec Alternative

Notta Online Transcription Review 2026: Free Plan Limits, Traditional Chinese Accuracy, and Tinrec Alternative

How does Notta online transcription work, and is the free plan enough? This article breaks down Notta's meeting bot and desktop bot-free recording, the 120-minute monthly and 3-minute per-recording limits, and Traditional Chinese recognition considerations. It also compares Tinrec across five dimensions—meeting initiation, post-meeting organization, multilingual support, team governance, and pricing—to help you choose the right online transcription solution.

2026-10-19
The Complete 2026 Guide to Apple Watch Voice-to-Text: A Better Team Choice Beyond Notta

The Complete 2026 Guide to Apple Watch Voice-to-Text: A Better Team Choice Beyond Notta

Recording on Apple Watch is convenient, but the real challenge is post-meeting organization. This article addresses common misconceptions about watch recording and explains how to import Apple Watch voice memos into Tinrec to generate transcripts, summaries, action items, and enable team collaboration. It also clarifies the boundaries of Notta's Apple Watch solution.

2026-10-19
2026 Notta Online Captions Review: Free Tier Limits + SRT Timecode Test

2026 Notta Online Captions Review: Free Tier Limits + SRT Timecode Test

A practical breakdown of Notta's online captions and meeting transcription limits: free plan offers 120 minutes per month with a 3-minute cap per segment, and SRT export requires Pro or higher. We also compare Tinrec's no-bot meeting recording, AI Q&A, and team knowledge retention workflow, with buying tips, pitfalls to avoid, and scenario-based recommendations.

2026-10-19
2026 AI Meeting Transcription Software Cost Comparison: Notta vs. Tinrec Subscription Plans

2026 AI Meeting Transcription Software Cost Comparison: Notta vs. Tinrec Subscription Plans

How much does Notta cost? This article breaks down Notta's free plan limits (120 minutes per month, 3 minutes per session), the difference between Pro annual at US$8.17/month and monthly at US$13.99, and Business per-seat pricing. It also compares actual costs and use cases for Tinrec, Otter.ai, and TurboScribe to help you understand the costs before committing to an annual plan.

2026-10-19
Notta vs Tinrec 2026: 5-Dimension Comparison — Which Free Version Is Enough?

Notta vs Tinrec 2026: 5-Dimension Comparison — Which Free Version Is Enough?

Notta's free plan offers 120 minutes per month but only 3 minutes per recording — is that enough? This article compares Notta and Tinrec free versions across 5 dimensions from a mid-level manager's meeting perspective, and covers how Tinrec handles recording, transcription, summaries, action items, and team collaboration in practice, helping you decide whether to upgrade.

2026-10-19
3 AI Meeting Transcription Tools Tested for 2026: Is Notta Any Good? Is the Free Version Enough?

3 AI Meeting Transcription Tools Tested for 2026: Is Notta Any Good? Is the Free Version Enough?

Is Notta worth it? This hands-on review breaks down Notta's transcription, translation, AI summaries, and three key free-plan limits (3 minutes per recording, Pro required for export, 10 summaries per month), compares Pro and Business pricing, and contrasts it with Tinrec and Otter.ai to help you decide which tool fits your meeting style.

2026-10-19
2026 Comparison of 6 Audio-to-Text Tools: Beyond Notta, Which Is More Time-Saving for Chinese Meetings?

2026 Comparison of 6 Audio-to-Text Tools: Beyond Notta, Which Is More Time-Saving for Chinese Meetings?

When choosing an audio-to-text tool, most people only look at accuracy, but the real money-wasters are quota calculations, single-recording length limits, and post-meeting organization workflows. This article compares 6 tools, starting from Notta's positioning, explaining who each is suitable for, how plans are calculated, and how to choose for Chinese meeting scenarios.

2026-10-19
How to Use Notta's Recommended Features in 2026: 5-Step Hands-On Test and Selection Advice

How to Use Notta's Recommended Features in 2026: 5-Step Hands-On Test and Selection Advice

Starting from a weekly meeting that couldn't reach a conclusion, this hands-on review covers Notta's 6 recommended features and free version limitations, and compares Tinrec, Otter.ai, and TurboScribe on Chinese meetings, bot-free recording, AI Q&A, and team collaboration. It also includes 3 key pitfalls to avoid when choosing a tool and scenario-based recommendations.

2026-10-19
2026 Subtitle & Transcript Tool Comparison: Is Notta's Free Plan Enough for Subtitles?

2026 Subtitle & Transcript Tool Comparison: Is Notta's Free Plan Enough for Subtitles?

People searching for 'Notta subtitle recommendations' often confuse transcripts with subtitles. This article starts with the most common pitfalls in subtitle creation, compares Notta, TurboScribe, Otter.ai, and Tinrec in terms of quota calculations, export formats, Chinese language performance, and post-meeting organization capabilities, and honestly lists each tool's free limitations and pricing to help you determine which one truly meets your needs.

2026-10-19
Use Tinrec Now