Turn recordings into transcripts and summaries in minutes
Upload audio or video for multilingual transcription, AI notes, and action items
It's 9:30 PM. The meeting ended hours ago, but you're still wearing headphones, replaying that 90-minute discussion, hitting pause every few seconds to type conclusions into Word.
Many office workers know this scene all too well. Everyone nodded during the meeting, but when it's time to deliver the minutes, you realize: who said what, who owns which action item, which version of last week's decision was final—all of it requires listening to the recording again.
In this article, I'll walk through Tinrec's complete 5-step workflow, from recording all the way to generating minutes and action items. Then I'll compare it with Yating and Notta to help you decide which one fits your use case.
Before You Start | What You Need to Prepare
- A phone or a computer. Tinrec has a mobile app and a desktop version, both supported.
- An audio segment to process. It can be a live recording, an online meeting, or an audio/video file already on your phone.
- A stable internet connection. Real-time transcription requires internet; for offline use, check language packs first.
- Notify and get consent before recording. This is basic courtesy, and in some regions it's also a legal requirement—good to make it a habit.
If you're dealing with online meetings, using the desktop version is the easiest—see Step 1 for why.
Step 1 | Record the Meeting or Import an Existing Audio File
The goal here is to get a clear audio source. The quality of all subsequent steps depends on this.
For in-person meetings, open the mobile app and hit record. Place the phone in the center of the table, as close to the main speakers as possible.
For online meetings, open the Tinrec desktop version and let it capture the system audio playing from your computer. It doesn't need to invite an extra meeting bot into Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, or Webex—no unfamiliar account suddenly appears on the participant list.
Why mention this specifically? Because many people avoid AI meeting tools precisely because they don't want a bot in client meetings. Capturing system audio eliminates that concern. Note that it processes the meeting audio played on your computer from these platforms; it's not an official integration with the platforms.
If the meeting is already over, don't worry. Tinrec supports uploading audio and video files, so you can still process past recordings.
Once done, you'll see the recording in your list with its duration, ready to process anytime.
Step 2 | Let AI Transcribe It for You
The goal here is to turn "listening" into "reading."
After the recording is created, the system transcribes it into text, with utterances arranged by time, searchable and reviewable. It handles Chinese and mixed Chinese-English meetings; for cross-language meetings, you can enable real-time translation during recording and view the original, translation, or bilingual versions.
Honestly, transcription won't be 100% perfect. When multiple people speak over each other, there's air conditioning noise, heavy accents, or dense technical terms, the error rate goes up. That's why the next step exists.
Step 3 | Quickly Proofread the Transcript
The goal here is to fix obvious typos, not to retype everything word by word.
Errors usually cluster around names, product names, abbreviations, and numbers. My approach is to scan through first, fix only what "affects understanding," and use timestamps to verify the rest against the recording.
For team use, you can create team hotwords—add company-specific terms, product codes, and client names—and recognition will be more consistent afterward. This is a layer many similar tools don't specifically offer.
Step 4 | Let AI Generate Summaries, Chapters, and Action Items
The goal here is to compress 90 minutes into something you can read in 3 minutes.
After the transcript is ready, Tinrec generates an AI summary and chapters, breaking the long meeting into topic segments so you know which minutes covered budget and which covered timeline. It also extracts action items, telling you directly what to do after the meeting.
For further output, you can use Agent post-processing to turn the meeting into a report, table, or document draft.
Just getting a transcript isn't enough. The transcript is raw material; summaries and action items are the finished products people actually use.
Step 5 | Export, Share, and Build Team Knowledge
The goal here is to make the meeting content accessible to others.
For a single meeting, you can export to common formats or continue editing in Notion, Google Docs, OneNote, or Dropbox. For reporting to your manager, document or table output is fastest.
For team use, put it in the team space—data belongs to the team, not to an individual's account. New members can see past meetings without asking "what was that conclusion last time?" again.
Stop organizing recordings by hand
Upload audio or video and automatically get a transcript, summary, and action items
Here you need to distinguish roles and seats: roles determine who can manage the team, members, and audits; seats determine whether a person can record, upload, edit, and export. Members without a seat can still view, play, and read team data, but cannot perform actions that generate content.
When a member leaves or is removed, their team resources need to be handed over to other active members—data won't disappear with the person. Admins can also see team usage trends, member rankings, and activity logs, which is much clearer for budgeting or internal control than "one account per person."
Currently, the team plan offers a 7-day trial, 1 free seat, and 300 minutes of shared team import quota; paid plans are USD 29.80 per paid seat per month, or USD 199 per paid seat per year (about USD 16.58/month). Under an active plan and active seats, real-time recording currently does not deduct minutes; file and web link imports use the shared team import quota. Prices and promotions are subject to the official purchase page.
FAQ and Troubleshooting
Q1: Is the free version enough?
The personal plan has a free quota to try. I recommend running one of your own meeting recordings through it first to see if the quality is acceptable, then decide whether to upgrade. For short-term intensive meetings or interviews, consider a weekly card; for weekly needs, Pro is more suitable.
By the way, Notta's free version is 120 minutes per month with a 3-minute limit per item—long meetings get cut off, so factor that in.
Q2: What if there are many typos in the transcript?
First check the recording quality. Too far away, too noisy, multiple people talking at once—any tool will struggle. Second, use team hotwords and narrow proofreading to "sections that affect understanding" rather than retyping everything.
Q3: Do online meetings always require a bot to join?
Not necessarily. Tinrec's desktop version captures system audio, so no extra bot needs to join the meeting. For external meetings and client visits, this difference matters a lot.
Q4: Can all team members edit data?
No, you need to distinguish. Active members can view and play; only those with a seat can record, upload, edit, and export. Also, currently it's team-level sharing, not fine-grained file-level permissions—make this clear to colleagues before adoption.
Q5: Can deleted recordings be recovered?
Team audio goes to the recycle bin and can be restored before permanent deletion begins; currently retained for 30 days. Action items are not covered by the recycle bin—look twice before deleting.
Q6: Can you guarantee accuracy?
No one should promise that. Audio quality, accents, noise, overlapping speech, and technical terms all affect results. A more realistic statement: it can significantly reduce typing time, but important content should still be verified by replaying at the timestamp.
Advanced Tips | 3 Ways to Double Tinrec's Efficiency
1. Enable real-time translation for cross-language meetings
During recording, you can switch between original, translation, or bilingual view—no need to run a separate translation process afterward. For those who meet with overseas colleagues or clients, this saves a whole step.
2. Use AI Q&A to turn past meetings into a database
The real value of accumulated meetings is "searchability." You can ask follow-up questions about single or multiple meetings—for example, what concerns a client raised in the past, or which meeting finalized a decision. Most pure transcription tools stop at the transcript; Q&A is another level.
3. Set up team hotwords and a fixed export workflow
Build your terminology, then fix exports to Notion or Google Docs, so meeting minutes automatically flow into your existing workflow instead of sitting in another system nobody opens.
If You Don't Use Tinrec, Here Are Other Options
Yating: A local Taiwan tool; multi-speaker recognition is its strength. If you need transcripts close to Taiwan accents, try it first; the downside is slower transcription speed—be prepared if you're in a hurry.
Notta: Multi-platform transcription, translation, and team plans are fairly complete; file transcription and subtitles are strengths. Free version: 120 minutes per month, 3 minutes per item. If you mainly process pre-recorded files, put it on your comparison list.
But if what you want is "record at the meeting, generate minutes and action items right after, and put them in a team space for colleagues to search," Tinrec's end-to-end workflow from recording to collaboration saves a lot of tool-switching costs.
Conclusion
After these 5 steps, you'll have a searchable transcript, an AI summary and chapters, a list of action items, and a team space where colleagues can look things up themselves.
The real time sink is never the recording—it's the organizing and follow-up afterward. Take one of your meeting recordings, run it through the free quota first, see if the quality and minutes are usable, then decide whether to make it a regular workflow.
Finally, remember to notify and get consent from participants before recording—it's not just courtesy, it's also self-protection.
References
- 2026 Selected 6 Voice-to-Text Apps: Solving Meeting Minutes and Transcript Pain Points - Tinrec Blog
- AI Voice-to-Text Tool Recommendations: 8 Comparisons, Which Is Best for Meeting Notes, Transcripts, and Voice Input? — Leading Age
- [AI Voice Notes] 5 Highly Recommended AI Transcription Tools! Generate Transcripts and Meeting Highlights, Free vs Subscription, Pros and Cons | 104 Workplace
- Super Useful! Best Voice-to-Text Apps of 2025 (Android/iPhone) - Wondershare Filmora
- Voice-to-Text App Recommendations: 1. iPhone/iPad Notes App - Supports real-time text conversion - Cost: Free - Supports Chinese and English
Turn every recording into actionable outcomes
Get 60 free transcription minutes when you sign in. No credit card required.
Related Reading
You might also like

4 AI Speech-to-Text Tools Compared for 2026: Meeting Notes, Transcripts, and Free Tiers Explained
Two-hour meetings followed by two hours of organizing notes is a daily reality for many office workers. This article starts with the four most overlooked key points when choosing a tool, then compares Tinrec, Notta, Granola, and Otter.ai on meeting capture methods, post-meeting organization capabilities, free tiers, and team data governance. It also summarizes four common pitfalls to help you choose the right tool for your actual scenarios.

5 Speech-to-Text Apps Tested for 2026: Which One Actually Saves Time on PTT's Hot List?
Every few months, someone on PTT asks which speech-to-text app is most accurate, but the real issue usually isn't the tool. This article tackles three common misconceptions, then walks through a complete five-step workflow: record, transcribe, proofread, generate summaries and action items, and export. It also includes a copy-paste AI prompt template and clarifies the roles and seat differences that teams often misunderstand.

5 Speech-to-Text Tools Compared for 2026: How to Choose from Google's Free Options to Paid AI Assistants
Searching for "speech to text" on Google brings up three free options: Google Docs voice typing, Google Cloud Speech-to-Text, and the Google Recorder app. This article approaches the topic from a purchasing decision perspective, first explaining the 5 key criteria for choosing a speech-to-text tool, then comparing Google's three free entry points, Notta, and Tinrec. Finally, it provides clear recommendations based on budget and use case.

5 Best Speech-to-Text Apps in 2026: Which Dcard-Favorite Tool Is Best for Chinese Meetings?
What's the real difference between the speech-to-text apps repeatedly mentioned on Dcard? This article uses a 47-minute meeting recording to walk through 5 steps: recording, transcription, proofreading, generating meeting minutes, and exporting. It also outlines the positioning of iPhone Notes, Yating Transcription, MyEdit, NotebookLM, and Tinrec to help you choose between free and paid options.

2026 Sales Meeting Notes Template Comparison: Which One Auto-Generates Action Items and Client Follow-Ups?
A practical comparison of sales meeting notes templates in 2026, covering essential fields and post-meeting workflows across Word, Excel, Notion, Notta, Granola, and Tinrec. Focused on client needs, objections, decision-makers, budget, and action item tracking to help you choose the template that turns into an action list fastest.

2026 Voice-to-Text App Comparison: Which One Turns Chinese Meeting Transcripts into Action?
Starting from a 47-minute interview recording, we tested three approaches: Yating Transcript, iPhone Notes, and Tinrec. We break down a five-step workflow: record, transcribe, proofread, generate meeting minutes, and export for collaboration—so transcripts truly become actionable meeting materials.

5 Speech-to-Text Tools Tested: Google Docs vs Tinrec for Chinese Meetings (2026)
Google Docs voice typing is free and built-in, but it only turns speech into text. After testing 5 tools, I found that the real time sink is post-meeting organization and follow-up. This article breaks down Google Docs voice typing steps and 3 practical limitations, and compares Tinrec, Notta, Granola, and PLAUD Note on Chinese meetings, bot-free recording, and team data retention, helping you choose the right one.

2026 Sales Meeting Notes Comparison Guide: From Table Fields to AI Automation
A sales meeting notes comparison table is more than a template—it's a process for capturing customer needs, objections, decisions, and action items. This guide compares Tinrec, Otter.ai, Fireflies.ai, and Notta across table fields, tool selection, bot-free recording, AI summaries, and team collaboration, with pitfalls and selection advice.

Best Speech-to-Text AI in 2026: 5 Tools Tested, This One Has the Most Generous Free Tier
There are plenty of free speech-to-text AI tools, but how the free quota is calculated, what input sources are supported, and what you need after the meeting are the real deciding factors. This article uses Tinrec as an example to walk through the complete 5-step workflow—from recording, transcription, proofreading, generating summaries and action items, to exporting—and compares the free plans of Otter.ai, Fireflies.ai, Notta, and TurboScribe to help you decide which one is truly sufficient.
