TinrecAI Meeting Recorder

How to Use Google Meet Whiteboard in 2026? 5 Steps with Jamboard Alternatives for Collaboration

Google Jamboard will be fully discontinued by the end of 2026, with files becoming inaccessible starting January 1, 2026. This article outlines the Jamboard retirement timeline, the current state of Google Meet's whiteboard feature, and 5 practical steps to migrate to FigJam, Lucidspark, or Miro, ensuring a seamless transition for your meeting whiteboard workflows.

Productivity Tips
QING
September 12, 2026
36 min
77 views

Turn recordings into transcripts and summaries in minutes

Upload audio or video for multilingual transcription, AI notes, and action items

In 2026, Don't Count on Jamboard for Google Meet Whiteboard

For many, their first experience sharing a whiteboard in Google Meet started with Jamboard. By clicking the "Whiteboard" feature on the right side of the screen and selecting Jamboard, you could draw, add sticky notes, and organize ideas with meeting participants.

But if you've opened Google Meet recently, you might have noticed things are different.

Google ended full support for Jamboard on September 30, 2026. Starting October 1, Jamboard devices went offline, and the app became view-only. By January 1, 2026, Jamboard files became completely inaccessible.

In short: To use Google Meet's whiteboard in 2025, you'll need to find an alternative.

First, Understand the Relationship Between Google Meet's Built-in Whiteboard and Jamboard

In the Google Meet interface, the terms "Whiteboard" and "Jamboard" are often used interchangeably. Previously, clicking the whiteboard feature would default to creating a Jamboard file.

Now, Google has handed the future of whiteboard collaboration to three tools: FigJam (by Figma), Lucidspark, and Miro. Google Workspace officially recommends that users import their old Jamboard files into these three platforms to continue editing.

It's important to note that Google Meet hasn't completely removed the whiteboard entry point, but it's no longer backed by the Jamboard service. In practice, you're more likely to open FigJam, Lucidspark, or Miro directly and then share your screen in the meeting.

Jamboard Retirement Timeline: Can You Still Recover Your Files?

If you've stored a number of Jamboard files, this timeline is crucial:

  • September 30, 2026: Last day of full Jamboard support.
  • October 1, 2026: Jamboard devices go offline; the app becomes read-only.
  • January 1, 2026: Jamboard files become inaccessible.

In other words, starting in 2025, any Jamboard content not exported before the deadline will essentially be lost. Google's official advice is to import your files into FigJam, Lucidspark, or Miro before the cutoff date.

If you're just now realizing this, first check whether you have any backups. If you do, prioritize handling them. If not, treat it as a lesson in data management and remember to regularly export your cloud whiteboard content in the future.

5 Steps for Google Meet Whiteboard Collaboration in 2025

Step 1: Choose an Alternative Tool

Google's three main recommendations are FigJam, Lucidspark, and Miro. You can quickly decide based on the following:

  • FigJam: Lightweight interface, ideal for quick brainstorming and sticky notes.
  • Lucidspark: Feature-rich, suitable for teams that need structured idea organization.
  • Miro: Mature large-scale whiteboard ecosystem, great for cross-departmental or complex projects.

If you're transitioning from Jamboard, try FigJam first. Its operation logic is closer to Jamboard, making the learning curve less steep.

Step 2: Create a Whiteboard for Your Meeting

Using FigJam as an example, create a new Board and add the meeting topic, date, and participants. Then, prepare a few sections: discussion area, to-do area, and decision area. This way, you won't waste time starting from a blank canvas when the meeting begins.

Stop organizing recordings by hand

Upload audio or video and automatically get a transcript, summary, and action items

Lucidspark and Miro have similar concepts, though the names may differ.

Step 3: Share Your Whiteboard Screen in Google Meet

After starting your Google Meet meeting, click "Share screen" or "Share window." Select the window of your whiteboard tool that you've already opened—avoid sharing your entire desktop to prevent accidentally exposing chat notifications.

After sharing, confirm that meeting participants can see the whiteboard content. If they report the view is too small, ask them to enlarge the window or use the zoom feature within the tool.

Step 4: Invite Participants to Collaborate in Real Time

Sharing your screen in Google Meet only lets others "see" the whiteboard. To allow participants to edit, you must share an editing link within FigJam, Lucidspark, or Miro.

Open the "Share" button in the top-right corner of your whiteboard tool, set it to "Anyone with the link can edit," and then paste the link into the Google Meet chat. This way, participants can type, add sticky notes, or draw on the whiteboard while on the video call.

Step 5: Export and Save After the Meeting

After the meeting ends, export the whiteboard content as a PDF or image and save it to your team's shared cloud folder. This step is often overlooked, but it's key to making meeting outcomes traceable.

If you want to preserve the full context of the discussion, also place the whiteboard link and meeting notes in the same document, so you don't have to dig through chat messages later.

How to Choose Among 3 Jamboard Alternatives

FigJam: The closest lightweight whiteboard to Jamboard. Ideal for small meetings, design discussions, and quick ideation. The free plan's features are usually sufficient for typical office workers.

Lucidspark: Emphasizes structured thinking, suitable for teams that need to categorize, prioritize, and turn ideas into action plans. If your meetings often need to converge on clear conclusions, consider this first.

Miro: The most feature-complete but also the most complex. Suitable for large teams, cross-departmental workshops, or scenarios requiring extensive templates. For simple weekly check-ins, Miro might feel overly heavy.

Avoid These Pitfalls: Don't Wait Until the Meeting Day to Test

Many people can't open a whiteboard in Google Meet meetings—not because the tool is broken, but because they never tested it beforehand.

The first pitfall is "assuming Google Meet still has built-in Jamboard." Before the meeting, confirm your whiteboard tool is ready; don't search for the entry point at the last minute.

The second pitfall is "only sharing the screen without enabling edit permissions." As a result, participants can only watch you draw, losing the collaborative value. Check link permissions before sharing.

The third pitfall is "not backing up old Jamboard files." If you have important content left on Jamboard, it's already inaccessible after 2025. What you can do now is verify backups of other cloud files and establish a new whiteboard workflow.

Summary: For Google Meet Whiteboard in 2025, Pick a Tool and Start Fresh

The Jamboard era officially ended in 2025, but the need for video collaboration in Google Meet hasn't disappeared. What you need isn't to mourn the old tool, but to quickly migrate your team's whiteboard workflow to FigJam, Lucidspark, or Miro.

If you were a light user, FigJam is the lowest-barrier starting point. If your team needs more comprehensive meeting data management, then evaluate Lucidspark or Miro further.

The most important things: test your whiteboard tool before the meeting, set up edit permissions, and remember to export and save after the meeting. That way, even without Jamboard, your Google Meet collaboration can continue seamlessly.

References

Turn every recording into actionable outcomes

Get 60 free transcription minutes when you sign in. No credit card required.

Upload audio or video for multilingual transcription, AI notes, and action items

Related Reading

You might also like

Which Transcription App Is Best? 2026 Hands-On Test of 3 Options and How to Get the Most Out of Yating's Free Quota

Which Transcription App Is Best? 2026 Hands-On Test of 3 Options and How to Get the Most Out of Yating's Free Quota

How much free quota does Yating Transcription offer? Real-time recording is free, and uploading audio files gets you trial hours, but one account can't be used on multiple devices simultaneously. This article hands-on tests 3 transcription tools, breaks down free quota traps, Cantonese recognition, and AI post-processing differences, and tells you which one is best for Hong Kong office workers.

2026-11-14
Yating Transcription Free Version 2026: How to Check Quota + Post-Transcription Workflow

Yating Transcription Free Version 2026: How to Check Quota + Post-Transcription Workflow

Is the free version of Yating Transcription enough? This article skips the spec sheet and first helps you distinguish between 'a single recording' and 'a complete workflow.' It then breaks down four aspects: free quota, audio retention, cross-device use, and post-meeting organization. It also compares Tinrec, Notta, Otter.ai, and TurboScribe for their suitable scenarios to help you decide whether to pay.

2026-11-14
2026 Comparison of 3 Online Transcription Tools: Yating Transcription Online Pricing vs. Tinrec Meeting Organization

2026 Comparison of 3 Online Transcription Tools: Yating Transcription Online Pricing vs. Tinrec Meeting Organization

Yating Transcription Online focuses on Taiwanese accent recognition and free real-time recording, while Tinrec extends transcription into summaries, action items, and team Q&A. This article compares their features, pricing, and use cases to help you choose the right tool.

2026-11-14
2026 Comparison of 3 Online Transcription Tools: Yating vs. Tinrec — Which Saves More Post-Meeting Time?

2026 Comparison of 3 Online Transcription Tools: Yating vs. Tinrec — Which Saves More Post-Meeting Time?

Many people search for "Yating online transcription" because they want to turn recordings into text without installing an app—just using a browser. This article compares three approaches: Yating's online service, built-in transcription in some meeting platforms, and Tinrec, based on real-world usage. It covers key selection factors such as real-time transcription, summaries and action items, AI Q&A, export options, and team collaboration.

2026-11-14
Which Transcription App Is Best? 2026 Hands-On Test of 3 Apps: Yating Pricing and Free Quotas Explained

Which Transcription App Is Best? 2026 Hands-On Test of 3 Apps: Yating Pricing and Free Quotas Explained

How is Yating transcription priced? How much can you actually use for free? This article starts with the most common misconception and compares Yating, Tinrec, and Notta with hands-on testing. It clearly explains hourly package pricing, free quotas, AI post-meeting summaries, and team collaboration differences, so you know the answers before spending money.

2026-11-14
Best Transcription Software? 2026 Hands-On Test of 3 Tools: Yating Pricing and Tinrec Compared

Best Transcription Software? 2026 Hands-On Test of 3 Tools: Yating Pricing and Tinrec Compared

How is Yating transcription priced? Is the hourly package worth it? This article starts from the decision point of 'should I buy an hourly package or a subscription?' and organizes Yating's pricing model and free quota controversy. It also hands-on compares Tinrec, Otter.ai, and Notta on Chinese recognition, post-meeting organization, and team collaboration to help you choose the one that best fits your usage frequency.

2026-11-14
2026 Tinrec Meeting Toolbar: No-Bot Recording + AI Summaries & Action Items in One Place

2026 Tinrec Meeting Toolbar: No-Bot Recording + AI Summaries & Action Items in One Place

Starting from the search demand for 'Yating transcript toolbar,' this guide walks you through common pain points of transcript toolbars and uses Tinrec as an example to show how a more complete meeting workflow can handle recording, transcription, summaries, action items, AI Q&A, and team collaboration.

2026-11-14
2026 Comparison of 4 Cantonese Speech-to-Text Tools: Which One Can Actually Extract Meeting Action Items?

2026 Comparison of 4 Cantonese Speech-to-Text Tools: Which One Can Actually Extract Meeting Action Items?

Tired of spending hours organizing Cantonese meeting recordings? Based on the real needs of mid-level managers, this article compares Tinrec, CantoSub, Speechnotes, and Otter.ai on Cantonese transcription, post-meeting summaries, action item extraction, and team collaboration. It also covers selection criteria and pitfalls to help you find the right Cantonese speech-to-text solution.

2026-11-14
2026 WeChat Voice-to-Text Cantonese Comparison: Chat Is Fine, Meetings Need AI

2026 WeChat Voice-to-Text Cantonese Comparison: Chat Is Fine, Meetings Need AI

WeChat's built-in voice-to-text is handy for reading Cantonese chat messages, but it falls short for meetings, interviews, or 40-minute recordings. This article runs the same Cantonese audio through WeChat built-in, phone recorder, WhatsApp, and Tinrec's AI meeting organizer to help you decide if free features are enough, when to switch tools, and what to look for when buying.

2026-11-14
Use Tinrec Now