2026 Comparison of 2 Meeting Note Tools: After Replacing Facetime with Google Meet, Which One Handles Chinese Meetings Better?

Do you also use Facetime for video calls with family and friends, but find it lacking for meetings? Google Meet is free, cross-platform, and accessible directly from a browser, making it a popular choice to replace Facetime. But after the meeting ends, relying on handwritten notes for discussions, decisions, and action items can easily lead to missed details.

So this time I picked two highly discussed meeting note tools—Tinrec (MiaoTing) and Otter.ai—to see which one can better turn your Google Meet meetings into usable records. I'll compare them on Chinese accuracy, supported sources, AI capabilities, and pricing—the points most people care about.

Tinrec vs Otter.ai | Quick Overview

Tinrec is an AI recording and audio/video organization tool, designed to turn meetings, classes, interviews, and online videos into searchable, queryable archives. Otter.ai started as an AI meeting note taker, with strengths in automatically joining online meetings, real-time transcription, and team collaboration.

• Pricing: Tinrec offers a free version (monthly basic quota), Pro monthly/yearly; Otter free gives 300 minutes/month, Pro is about $8.33/month billed annually.
• Platform: Both have iOS, Android, and web versions.
• Key Difference: Otter is more of a pure meeting bot; Tinrec handles more source types and offers more detailed Chinese content processing.

Let's dive into each dimension.

Dimension 1 | Chinese Meeting Transcription Accuracy

Otter's English transcription is strong, but when switching to Chinese meetings, it performs average—errors increase noticeably with mixed Chinese-English and multiple speakers, and it often fails to recognize Taiwanese terms.

Tinrec, on the other hand, has been optimized for Chinese from the start, especially for Traditional Chinese contexts like meetings and lectures. The transcripts are much smoother, with fewer awkward sentence breaks. We tested with the same 10-minute Chinese meeting recording (Google Meet, 2 speakers, mild background noise). Tinrec's output required almost no manual correction to serve as meeting notes.

→ This dimension: Tinrec clearly wins

Dimension 2 | Multi-Source Audio/Video Support

Otter is mainly centered around meetings. While it does allow uploading audio files, its handling of non-meeting content like online videos or local files is quite basic.

Tinrec offers much more flexibility: you can record meetings live, upload old audio files, paste YouTube or Xiaohongshu links for transcription, and even parse videos playing on your computer. This is far more convenient for anyone who needs to manage meetings, classes, interviews, and web content together.

→ This dimension: Tinrec wins

Dimension 3 | AI Processing and Post-Processing

Otter auto-generates summaries, labels speakers, and captures action items—enough for basic needs. However, if you want deeper processing, such as converting meeting content into to-do lists, mind maps, or asking follow-up questions about the recording, it falls short.

Tinrec goes beyond summaries, chapters, and to-dos with an AI Q&A feature—you can query the recording like a database, e.g., "What was the budget number mentioned earlier?" or "What changes did the client request?"—and get direct answers. After transcription, you can export to Notion, Google Docs, or have the AI generate meeting notes and reports.

→ This dimension: Tinrec wins

Dimension 4 | Pricing and Free Plan Comparison

Otter's free plan offers 300 minutes per month, decent for light use, but exceeding that requires payment, and advanced features are locked behind Pro.

Tinrec's free version also provides a basic quota sufficient for testing. If you need frequent transcription, its Pro pricing is reasonable, and the free plan doesn't feel too restrictive.

→ This dimension: Tie (each suits different usage levels)

What Are Their Unique Strengths?

Tinrec's Unique Strengths

• More accurate for Chinese meetings: Better recognition of Traditional Chinese contexts and mixed Chinese-English speech compared to typical meeting bots.
• Handles more than just meetings: Audio files, online videos, live recordings—all can flow into the same processing pipeline.
• Post-transcription utility: AI Q&A, multiple export formats, report generation—turning recordings into actionable data.

Otter's Unique Strengths

• Auto-join online meetings: High integration, no manual recording needed, ideal for teams needing fully automated notes.
• Team collaboration features: Sharing, editing, comments—better for cross-department projects.

Summary: Which One Should You Choose?

• If you need to organize Chinese meetings, classes, or online videos and want to query, export, and further process after transcription → Tinrec
• If your meetings are entirely in English and you need auto-join and team co-editing → Otter.ai
• If you don't want to spend extra on hardware but want to easily record and transcribe → Start with Tinrec's free version

In a nutshell: For most Chinese users, Tinrec is more comprehensive for meeting notes, lecture notes, and video material processing. I recommend starting with the free version and testing it with your own Google Meet meetings.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can Tinrec record Google Meet meetings?

Yes. By recording system audio on your phone or computer, you can transcribe Google Meet calls into text.

Does the free version have time limits?

There is a basic quota, enough to experience live recording, file transcription, and online video parsing. Check the official website for exact numbers.

Which is more accurate, Otter.ai or Tinrec?

It depends on the scenario. Otter performs well on English meetings, but for Chinese meetings or mixed Chinese-English content, Tinrec offers better recognition and fluidity.

Can I export transcriptions to other tools?

Tinrec supports multiple export formats, including text files and subtitles, and can sync directly to Notion, Google Docs, etc.

Is the recording privacy secure?

Both tools have privacy policies, but for confidential meetings, please review each platform's data protection terms.

Which plan should I choose?

For occasional transcription, the free version is sufficient. If you have meetings or classes weekly, Pro monthly is cost-effective. For long-term heavy use, the yearly plan offers lower monthly cost.